
by Jacob Sprecher
Sometimes overlooked in the grand scheme of musical hipness and underground independence amid the sparkle-flyin’ pancake flips of this here U. S. of A. is the City By the Bay, the onetime home of hippiedom, Dead Kennedy punk and Lookout pop. (Well, Lookout wasn’t technically an SF scene, but it’s close enough.) But if you live in New York, if you live in L.A., if you live in Portland, Austin, Seattle, Chicago, wherever; it would be just to make note that there’s an entire boatload of wonderful rock humanity alive and well in Tony Bennett’s heart of hearts.
The Fresh & Onlys, four pieces of psych-garage with enough pop chops to melt your arteries, are as much a representation of that special brand of West Coast swing as any. Though together just two and a half years, the Fresh & Onlys now have three full-length LPs (self-titled, Grey Eyed Girls, Play It Strange) and a small slew of EPs (August In My Mind, etc) beneath their studded belt buckles. The latter LP, Play It Strange, enjoys this very day as its release on In The Red, and let me tell you: it’s goddamn well something to lend an ear.
In anticipation of the Fresh & Onlys official release show this Saturday at Cafe Du Nord (with Kelley Stoltz, who also happens to be releasing a shit-hot LP of his own), Hi-Fi Hangover conned lead guitarist/musical chairs specialist Wymond Miles into answering a quick batch of questions.
Hi-Fi: Why the switch from Woodsist to In The Red? Any differences in working with the two labels?
Wymond: We’re just very fortunate to have opportunities to work with labels we admire. From an artist’s perspective the labels are run quite similar, really.
I genuinely believe Play It Strange to be your most cohesive and polished work thus far, be it song structures, lyricism, production, you name it. Was any of the material in your back pocket over a length of time, or did it all come from a creative creative burst? Was there anything particularly new or special in the band’s songwriting dynamics this go round?
I think it sounds cohesive because we toured most of those songs when we were on the road last year with Thee Oh Sees. Everything was pretty razor sharp and tight when we went to record it from playing them every night for a month. We always seem to be one album ahead of the album we are touring for, i.e, Thee Oh Sees trip was the Grey Eyed Girls tour, but we had all this material burning up for Play It Strange we were more excited to play. This tour might be the same, we have another album we’re working on now and we just want to play the new stuff. Die-hards will recognize our early versions of various songs from our cassette releases, both the Woodsist Bomb Wombs and an earlier self-released cassette. Most of the tunes were written in one creative pulse awhile back, we work on songs constantly, so that initial burst feels so long ago.
Production-wise, Play It Strange seems closer to the self-titled record than Grey Eyed Girls, the latter of which was a bit more raw and noisy. Obviously the new album is not overproduced by any stretch of the imagination, but were you aiming to slick things up a bit, or did It happen to unfold that way during mixing? Were you working with anyone new in-studio through the production process?
We recorded this record at Louder Studios with Tim Green. We just wanted to try something else on and see how it fit. See how things went outside the creature comforts of our own studios, we weren’t looking to make a glossy hi-fi record, but we did just want someone else to engineer it and handle all the technical aspects so we could just set up in a room and play the songs as we did on tour.
Tim and I both have the same tape machine so all the previous records were made at both of our homes…but the sheen that you hear has more to do with the 2-inch tape we recorded on, rather than our usual 1/4-inch.
I agree that this album is more akin to the first record, something in the song dynamics and the playfulness of it all. Also the first record we had demo versions of most all of those songs that we refined while playing live and then re-recorded for the final LP, you know, what most bands do! However, Grey Eyed Girls the songs were being written and recorded at the same time. There’s a certain pure rawness to that album, in the most honest and naked of ways because of that exposed process. It’s also a darker record than the new one. The August In My Mind EP is well worth your time to listen to if you haven’t yet, it is the strongest reflection of who we are as a band. It’s a shame EPs don’t get as much exposure as LPs. We treat them with the same fervent excitement as the LPs.
I was hoping that you might be able to explain the lyrical meaning/concept behind a few songs: “Summer Of Love,” “Waterfall” and “I’m A Thief.”
Ugh, this will require the tried and true—the art will have to speak on it’s own behalf answer. I will say “Summer Of Love” isn’t just a throwback tune to SF’s ’60s tourist nostalgia, and we were plucking that vibe in a very self-aware sort of way to describe a very modern narrative of SF. “Waterfall” isn’t about TVs. “I’m A Thief” is about thievery.
What’s your take on the rock ‘n’ roll status of San Francisco? With brief exceptions, a strong case can be made that the city hasn’t really enjoyed national recognition of a true “scene” since the punk of the late ’70s and early ‘80s. L.A. and New York are perhaps too far reaching, but, in your opinion, is San Francisco capable of putting itself back on par with cities like Portland and Austin?
The music climate in San Francisco is far superior to Portland and Austin, period. Our moment in musical history is unique, but continues along a distant winding path that has seen several genres of musical scenes emerge from it. Best not to identify ourselves with any of them but instead acknowledge our place in a greater ancestry of SF music, that if you take a few steps back, has always had a voice to offer. Everything else is just hype to push an angle to a story. Dichotomy of truth/untruth coexisting at the same time.